Agenda and minutes

Members are asked to declare any interests in the items under consideration and in doing so state:

(1) the type of interest concerned; and

(2) the nature of the interest concerned

If any Member requires advice on declarations of interest, they are advised to contact the Head of Democratic Services in advance of the meeting.

There were no declarations of interest on this occasion.

To agree the minutes of the last meeting held on 11th August 2014 as a true and correct record.

Resolved: That the minutes of the meeting held on 11th August 2014, be signed by the Chairman as a correct record.

The Committee will be requested to note the planning/enforcement appeals lodged and determined.

Resolved: To note the Planning/Enforcement Appeals lodged and determined.

Background papers: (1) Letter from the Planning Inspectorate dated 19^th August 2014.

(2) Letter from the Planning Inspectorate dated 22^nd August 2014.

The Committee will be asked to note the outcomes of the cases and approve the actions of the Service Manager – Public Protection.

Resolved: To note the outcomes of the cases set out in the report and to support the actions of the Service Manager - Public Protection in authorising the Notices.

The Committee will be requested to consider an application for planning permission, details of which are set out in the accompanying report.

The Committee considered application 12/0485 for the retention of single storey extension to existing unit and continued use of premises as ice skating centre with associated dance studio, storage space, café, external plant, car and coach parking, service yard and cycle store at the former TVR building, Bristol Avenue.

Mr J Vose addressed the Committee and spoke in objection to the application.

Mr Cassidy, agent for the applicant and Mr Nicholson, the applicant, spoke in support of the application.

Mr Johnston, Head of Development Management, summarised the reasons why the officers’ recommendation had been for refusal. The Committee was advised that those reasons included that the proposed development introduced an inappropriate use into an area allocated for industrial uses where the site offered appropriate employment opportunities. Mr Johnston also highlighted to the Committee that approval of the development may set a precedent, making it difficult for the Council to refuse future applications for similar proposals on land designated for industrial and business use elsewhere in the borough.

The Committee discussed the protection of employment land and the merits of continuing to protect land and premises that had stood inactive for a number of years. Members noted that there were a number of vacant business units available around the borough. They argued that the change of use of this particular unit would not impact significantly on the wider economic development of Blackpool and Members also commented that there would be a number of jobs created should the proposed development be approved.

The Committee considered that there were other premises in the area operating leisure facilities and that the further creation of a sports facility would be beneficial for residents.

The Committee was aware that the proposal was contrary to Policies RR1, DE1, BH11 and BH12 of the Blackpool Local Plan 2001-2016 but considered that there were a number of factors that outweighed the conflict with these policies. Those factors included that there were no suitable premises within the Town Centre and Resort Core, the premises had been marketed for a significant period of time and remained vacant, there were in the region of 80 vacant industrial premises across the town, the Moor Park industrial/Business Area contained a mixture of employment uses and the ice rink has created jobs and the use was a benefit to the local community.

Having visited the site and seen the space available for parking and servicing, the appearance of the building and the relationship to the nearest residential properties, the Committee did not consider that the use conflicted with Policies BH3, LQ1, LQ14, AS1 and AS2 of the Blackpool Local Plan 2001-2016. Members considered that the proposal was consistent with paragraphs 21, 22 and 24 of the National Planning Policy Framework in that the long term protection of the land was not justified because of its location relative to the motorway network, it had been previously marketed and because there were no suitable premises in the Town Centre and Resort Core.

The Committee had regard to  ...  view the full minutes text for item 5.